Nada School Saturday Class 2025
2025-05-24
Slide
https://gyazo.com/43c952a7f0f8fafb60a2a9b4e671a7ae
https://gyazo.com/2a3c6605e8ecdc90b564dcf8daaea242
I'll just reprint my part.
https://gyazo.com/5ca2f96d27bcc44530548a7baf8a55c7
unexplored junior
https://gyazo.com/ca71021c4f240dac8e3b1ba22660c203
Plurality Tokyo 2023
https://gyazo.com/61688742f2bbdb577df4d3320577357e
broad listening
Not subjective or objective, but from the subjectivity of one to the subjectivity of many.
https://gyazo.com/5b0306c62c00c02873809829186e4ee1
/plurality-japanese
https://gyazo.com/558069a4c9bb07e054274955c61479c5
Late May 2024, a turbulent time.
https://gyazo.com/7f49dd2fce2f19a7460fed35aecdd434
TTTC: Public Comments on AI and Copyright
https://gyazo.com/157295ad87669435b6eee0e7ef268499
Funding the Commons Tokyo 2024
FtC2024 Yasuno+Audrey
Plurality in Japan
https://gyazo.com/3ceb5c9d20f1ef364bdd07c797b6eb0e
Nittele NEWS x 2024 House of Representatives Election x Broad Listening
Shin Tokyo 2050 Broad Listening
https://gyazo.com/02df5c5ebaab8415a215c8900b2aa276
Digital Democracy 2030
https://gyazo.com/e472a026b531726dfc6d7be4ffb238a7
public information AI
Talk to the City and the History of Broadband AI
https://gyazo.com/e696d2da41bca9d63dadccf31e508bda
Example of Talk to the City being used by the opposition in the National Assembly to question the Prime Minister.
Constitutional AI Well-Being Conference
The Road to Renewal Broad Listening
https://gyazo.com/2138949daacfd7b08383daecce2b1656
Broad Listening becomes the standard strategy in one year.
https://gyazo.com/802b6ebe62f16fa089bc6f92002eec9a
https://gyazo.com/a6980af8ca3a75b9fec33e67b16a4f4e
Plurality Books
https://gyazo.com/c2feb3a23fccf9c6b81a909de30c3008
What is /plurality-japanese/plurality?
https://gyazo.com/9a6ad6afaa929a7e4cd2329f4e60f9aa
What is "Plurality"?
https://gyazo.com/ccc9759dad53e71a9a69caf81f3863bf
What is "Plurality"?
Trade-off between depth and breadth of cooperation
https://gyazo.com/2a213a0a7e0c1c8615b2ff3a0cf36f9c
Disinformation.
Audrey and d/acc and differential
https://gyazo.com/e29e794bd7b4b81bdcfe8b86c8d36fc6
Democracy is a social technology
question
Isn't there a possibility that the AI could skew it when it collects the opinions of many people and puts them together?
Of course there is that.
Related question: is there a bias in the LLM?
Diverse biases by LLMs.
Ask Qarasu-14B a question
But is there no bias if it is put together by a human being? Of course, humans have biases.
So this is not an "AI or human" issue.
Issues that should be resolved by creating mechanisms such as making the process open and verifiable by a third party
Related question: will AI be a black box?
Reasoning model works by verbalizing and outputting the thinking process, and is less of a black box than a person who thinks silently.
Research is also underway to examine the internal firing of the model during task execution. This is like sticking electrodes into the brain if you were to use a human analogy.
Stabbing electrodes into public officials is ethically difficult, but disclosing the internal state of AI in public service will be possible in the future.
If you think being a black box is a problem, you'd rather use AI instead of humans.
Not all people can think and speak out about politics, what do we do with those who don't?
Some radical views like unconscious data democracy are not in favor of it.
The current lack of opportunities for people to have their opinions heard and to feel good about expressing them is the reason why the ability to think and express opinions is not developed.
Especially minors do not have the right to vote, and when they come of age, they are suddenly told they should vote, which is absurd.
In Taiwan, systems such as JOIN created opportunities for students to voice their opinions from the student stage.
High School Students' Suggestions Led to Institutional Improvements at JOIN in Taiwan
Similar clusters were seen in [Shin Tokyo 2050 Broad Listening
Today's major social networking sites are marked by people with radical opinions.
Most people don't want to argue with radicals.
The pro-social media mindset is designed to draw attention to "Bridging Opinions" that are favored by those in different opinion clusters.
Bridging Bonus
Influence the international community?
Of course, the elimination of language barriers is significant
Q: If the generated AI creates a manifesto based on "what opinion will be received by citizens", won't all parties be the same?
When they gather in large clusters, differences disappear and supporters are more likely to be in flux, which the existing parties do not like.
When you visualize it, there are clusters that are not represented by a political party even at this point in time.
Even a small cluster can become a political party with 1%.
The assumption that all parties should go to large clusters is incorrect because it is a red ocean to go for a majority.
In the long run, it's unclear whether party politics will continue to feel the same way as it does now in the first place.
The balance of advantages and disadvantages of the party line is affected by the balance of advantages and disadvantages of the party line.
It may not be stable if the support base changes from one place to another.
I'm not sure where you're coming from with the assumption that it won't change, that it will change from one thing to another.
Nada School Saturday Class
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/灘校土曜講座2025 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.